what is BMI?Your Body Mass
Index – or BMI – is a measure of your weight in relation to your
height. Established by the National Institutes of Health in 1998, BMI
provides a fairly accurate estimate of body fatness for most people.
It’s an easy way to look at weight issues that may lead to health
problems.
how is it used?
BMI is used as a screening tool to identify possible weight problems
for adults. However, BMI is not a diagnostic tool. For example, a
person may have a high BMI without being at a high risk for health
problems. However, to determine if excess weight is a health risk, a
healthcare provider would need to perform further assessments. These
assessments might include skin-fold thickness measurements, evaluations
of diet, physical activity, family history, and other appropriate
health screenings.
are BMIs applicable to everyone?
BMI scores apply to adults, both men and women. But BMI scores for
children and teens are a different matter. You should discuss those
with a pediatrician.
how accurate is it?According
to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the correlation between
the BMI number and body fatness is fairly strong. But that correlation
varies by sex, race, and age.
1, 2
For example:
- At the same BMI, women tend to have more body fat than men.
- At the same BMI, older people, on average, tend to have more body fat than younger adults.
- Highly trained athletes may have a high BMI because of increased muscularity rather than increased body
fatness.
It is also important to remember that weight is only one factor related
to health risk. Other factors include diet, physical activity, family
history, blood pressure, abdominal fat and cholesterol. If you have
questions or concerns about the appropriateness of your weight, you
should discuss them with your healthcare provider.
*Prentice AM and Jebb SA. Beyond Body Mass
Index. Obesity Reviews. 2001 August; 2(3): 141–7. 2Gallagher D, et al.
How useful is BMI for comparison of body fatness across age, sex and
ethnic groups? American Journal of Epidemiology 1996;143:228–239.